Archive for May, 2008

Taking a break from minimalism, again

Monday, May 19th, 2008

Over the past few months I’ve put focused almost exclusively on producing minimalist paintings. And now I think it’s time to explore the opposite end of the compositional spectrum: what I call “maximalist” paintings. (It’s not my term, but it’s what I call that part of my work.)

abstract compositions
One of my favorite maximalist abstract compositions, Ultraam Aeterrix, from 2005. More like this in my flickr gallery.

To be honest, I think I’ve hit a wall with minimalism…for now. But I will come back to it at some point in the near future, I am sure. This isn’t the first time I’ve gone back and forth between minimalism and maximalism in the recent past.

I feel the way I do for two reasons:

One, the minimalist designs I’ve produced recently aren’t blowing my mind. For me, minimalism is a sensibility, a way of thinking, a way of making. The process of designing minimal compositions is very rewarding, in itself. But I’ve found that the end product doesn’t quite reach the intensity I originally sought.

Two, maximal abstract compositions are a blast to make, because they are often generated through improvisation. They afford seemingly infinite room for combinations of colors, lines and shapes, which excite the eye and fatigue the retina. Sources of inspiration are limitless. And to top it off I can give them perfectly strange names, like I Got Distracted by the Grass and Still Life with Inverted Florida Maritime and Diamonds.

I look forward to giving shape to the mental pictures I am currently carrying in everyday life. I see bizarre combinations of patterns, fluorescent colors and blown-apart logos. I see horizons of twisted significances and a color wheel that is spinning out of control!

I look forward to showing you the progress of this exploration quite soon.

 

Innovation means failure is inevitable

One of the things that has motivated me to paint was the idea that I was innovating: pushing new territory. That’s what got me going when I started 14 years ago. I wanted to make stuff that had never been seen before. I wanted people to experience work that was completely unhinged from reality. It was nonrepresentational and nonsensical.

When I paint a minimal painting, I get caught up in things like surface and lines. Minimalist painting is a purely visual experience. There is nothing to “read” on the painting.

It’s difficult, however, for me to try to innovate with minimalist painting. I have the horrible feeling that it’s already been done. No matter what I paint, it reminds me of something else. This may or may not be true in reality, but it feels that way.

With maximalism, anything goes. I can try to make things that I know for certain have never been seen before. I may triumph, I may roll the canvas up and hide it. The potential to innovate is there, however, and that’s what attracts me to it. Failure is part of the process.

Well that’s my story for the moment. Thanks for reading.

Until next time,
Grant Wiggins

New paintings

Friday, May 9th, 2008

I present to you the fruits of the this week’s labor: two new geometric paintings with a flowing design. While I put considerable thought and effort into designing these, when I finished these paintings I felt oddly neutral. Can’t explain why this happens. But it happens, and it’s part of the process. It’s not up to me what the “consensus” will be on these works.

Regardless, I’m in the process of reworking this concept for more paintings—reconsidering how much negative space to let in, what colors to use, how many stripes to involve, etc. While I feel like I’m not there with these, I can live with the uncertainty. And that’s what keeps me going.

Wishing you happiness and the causes of happiness,
—Grant Wiggins

Randomized color combinations can’t always be trusted

Thursday, May 1st, 2008

Random color combinations are an unfailing key to artistic inspiration. I’ve used everything from having an “art lottery” format — where I’ve assigned numbers to a chart of colors, and picked the numbers at random using a bingo drum (a long story!) — to using random.org’s random number generator to select CMYK values.

Last night I bumped into the ColorSchemer Studio software app, which is a nifty tool for building color schemes. It also has a randomize feature (exactly what I was looking for), which assigns groups of colors according to triads, tetrads, etc.

After messing with the randomize feature for far too long, I have decided once and for all that random color combinations can’t always be trusted, because of the eye-irritant stuff that they yield most of the time.

For example:

randomized color combinations

In the past, when I deliberately used multiple discordant colors in one painting, this randomization strategy could prove very handy. But now I prefer schemes that are more direct — I leave less to chance.

While I have eschewed color randomization, I will say that I have very fond of an another app made by ColorSchemer — a free app, at that — called Color Pix. This tool lets you read the hex numbers & CMYK values of anything on your screen. Works great.

Wishing you happiness and the causes of happiness,
Grant Wiggins