Posts Tagged ‘maximalism’

In the studio January 17, 2010: Abstract pop art?

Sunday, January 17th, 2010
abstract pop art
Work in progress: A painting called Hypermodic Spastaculatron, as of 5pm on January 17, 2010. Lots of fluorescent paint going on. Is it abstract pop art, or something entirely different?

The latest news from my studio is this:

My Spring/Summer 2010 collection of paintings is officially “on.” Projected launch date is May 15, 2010.

This will be a decidedly “maximalist” series of paintings. (See more in this style in my maximal abstract art gallery.) This will be a departure from my Fall 2009 Collection, which was focused completely on minimal, geometric compositions.

I am not sure whether labels from the 20th century, such “abstract” and “pop art” really define what I’m painting. (”Abstract pop art” doesn’t quite work, either!) What I’m painting is something new, something that defies categorization, something that hasn’t been seen before. I’m gathering new shapes, patterns, and colors and throwing them into the future.

A New Year’s ambition of mine is to paint one painting per week. The Spring/Summer collection would therefore roll out with 16 pieces, if I’m lucky. Year to date, I have completed 0 paintings. Today, I am still working on version #3 of painting #1 in the collection, shown above. I shall persist.

abstract pop art
Choosing my colors: In the studio on Saturday, January 16

All of this considered, I want to show you progress on my work as best as I can. Yet, I also want to keep the collection under wraps until the launch date. Therefore, I shall offer you glimpses of paintings in progress, when available. Just like above.

Anyway, thanks for stopping by.

Grant Wiggins

Balancing two very different styles of painting

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009
styles of painting
A simple scatter plot, which graphs independent variables (events that happen independently of each other.)

Creativity is like a scatter plot; it’s not a linear process.

As I look back upon the art I’ve produced over the past six years, I’ve noticed a trend. Actually, it’s a lack of a trend. A trendless trend.

Here’s what I mean: Since 2003, I have been painting and designing according to two very different styles of painting; each has two very different compositional approaches: 1) minimal, reductive paintings and 2) maximalist abstract paintings.

I once thought that I had to choose one of these styles of painting — for once and for all, and for good. I could be only a minimalist or a maximalist. But not both. Not having made up my mind, the way I saw it, was a sign of weakness.

Yet, after much deliberation, I never did make a choice. I just kept on making.

And so I continue: I get really into minimalism. But after a while, I hit a wall, and then get really into maximalist abstract painting, only to get distracted, and re-inspired, by minimalist painting all over again. Hence, my output has leapfrogged from one idea to the next, with seemingly little rhyme or reason, for years.

styles of paintingstyles of painting
Two very different styles of painting: Left: Space Loop I, a minimal painting from 2008. Right: Where Is Gibarian?, a maximalist abstract painting from 2008.

Let your mind bounce from one idea to the next

Good things happen when you follow your creative whims. Surveying my work over recent years, I realize that elements within my compositions are completely modular. For example, a trio of stripes from a minimal painting can easily serve as a focal point in a maximalist abstract painting.

Any color, stripe or shape can be applied to any painting I choose to make, regardless of the associated style.

Therefore, rather than see my creativity as a linear process, I have chosen to see what I make in terms of a scatter plot — a collection of independent variables that reside at different places on a graph — like the one above.

Over time, I have changed my mind frequently, going from one idea to the next, one painting to the next. Each painting is much like an independent variable, even though it is informed by my previous experiences.

Don’t make sense, just make

The creative “jumping around” may not make sense from a near-term perspective. However, I bet you could draw a trend line through a graph of everything I’ve made, delineating the average between all of these points, and everything would interconnect.

It’s easy to say that we should know exactly what we stand for at all times. It’s easy to adopt a singular art style and repeat whatever worked for you in the past. That’s safe. That makes sense.

But when you no longer think about making sense, you free up your mind to focus on making. And making, after all, is what art is all about.

The backstory behind new painting SuperAcid Autobacs-Ambilify

Saturday, June 20th, 2009

I wish I had the quote handy, but memory will have to suffice for the moment. Bridget Riley, the legendary Op Art painter, once said something along the lines of, “The more you give to your work, the more your effort will show through. Viewers will pick up on this.”

I sincerely hope this will be the case with my newest painting, SuperAcid Autobacs-Ambilify. This work took one month to create, and I scrapped two versions of it before arriving at the canvas pictured here.

SuperAcid Autobacs Ambilify
My new painting SuperAcid Autobacs Ambilify, completed on June 7, 2009

Painting SuperAcid, frankly, was a struggle, filled with twists, turns, dead ends, frustration, elation, and opportunity for reflection.

>> Continue reading 'The backstory behind new painting SuperAcid Autobacs-Ambilify'

A slew of sketches for the Cream Gallery mural

Sunday, June 14th, 2009

Moments ago I finished a set of preliminary sketches for Spencer Hibert’s much-anticipated Cream art gallery / video arcade / coffee shop / vegan donut emporium. Spencer is looking for something that he calls Aztec Atari.

With those two concepts to guide me, I produced the following set of sketches. The colors are fairly arbitrary and don’t really matter at this point; they can be changed in infinite ways. I view the process of choosing colors as a separate project anyway.

Regardless, whatever doesn’t wind up in the mural will probably land in a painting, or two, or 14 … who knows! It’s not the end result I’m concerned about, it’s the process … and I’ve had a lot of fun making these. I found the project very challenging.

Grant’s note of 16 June 09:

I just tended to version 2 by employing Spencer’s guidance (see comments). The first image shown below represents my interpretation of his guidance (version 2a). Below that, I decided to shake up the colors a bit, just to push the idea further (version 2b). Enough versions already, right?

Version 2a

Version 2b

Version 2c


Anyway, here are the original 7 sketches:

Version 2

Version 1a

Version 1b

Version 1c

Version 1d

Version 1e

Version 3

Do you, fair reader, have a favorite? Your insight is welcome.

Now it’s break time!

— Grant

Three new paintings

Monday, March 16th, 2009

Between February 8 and March 15—a span of 35 days—I produced 8,352 square inches of paintings. And now it’s time to take a break.

Out of this flurry of activity, three new large-scale paintings emerged. The first is Open System, which is 60 inches square (152.4 cm x 152.4 cm) and was produced between February 8 and 20, 2009:

New Painting: Open System
New Painting #1: Open System

Next came Invisible Star, which measures 32 x 66 inches (81.3 x 167.6 cm) and was produced between February 21 and March 3, 2009:

New Painting: Invisible Star
New Painting #2: Invisible Star

And the third piece is Acid Battleship Amylase. This painting also measures 60 inches square (152.4 cm square). I painted it from March 6 to 15, 2009.

New Painting: Acid Battleship Amylase
New Painting #3: Acid Battleship Amylase

Now I will get back to sketches and research: Thinking things through and readying myself for more new paintings.

In the studio: March 10, 2009 – New abstract painting

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

I’m not really into the term “abstract painting,” but since I really don’t know how to describe my art, then I have to settle with terms that the rest of the world uses. Abstract painting can mean anything to anyone. It’s almost a useless term.

That said, here’s a new abstract painting in the works. It’s called Acid Battleship Amylase, measures 60 inches square, and—thanks to a yummy fluoro yellow-chartreuse base—glows under blacklight.

The new abstract painting Acid Battleship Amylase

The new abstract painting Acid Battleship Amylase

But wait! There’s more! Below is the original sketch for this new abstract painting. I think the blue paint I’ve chosen is a little off. I prefer the 0F72B1 that I see below.

The sketch for the new abstract painting Acid Battleship Amylase

The sketch for the new abstract painting Acid Battleship Amylase

I haven’t ditched my maximalist style of painting. I may not feel like painting this way all of the time, because my mind changes and I go through phases. But when I do paint maximally, I’m out to produce the most radical structuring of shape and color possible, in my own way.

Some of my readers have suggested that they’re more interested in my maximalist style, compared with my minimalist style. I understand this … but there has to be room for both styles of new abstract painting in my creative life. I hope that makes sense. I haven’t lost anything … or given up on anything. If anything, I’m gaining; I’m working; I’m learning as I go.

Beyond that, I can’t stop listening to Ceephax Acid Crew, aka Andy Jenkinson. Check out the free downloads on his site. Be warned: The tunes are infectious.

—Grant Wiggins

A self-interview … of sorts

Thursday, September 18th, 2008

A couple of weeks back, I was contacted by year 12 student (equivalent to senior in high school in the U.S.) from Australia named Sarah. For an art class project, she was assigned to “do write-ups on artists,” as she puts it. Surfing around, she found my site, was interested in my hard-edge paintings, and wanted to ask a few questions via email. (Her paintings, by the way, are pretty impressive.)

Since I don’t really have occasion to give interviews, I thought I’d offer my responses here, in case you’re interested. I really like the interview format. It can afford a wonderful way to crystalize ideas and figure out one’s self. In the process, I feel like I learned something, or at least I learned a new way of articulating what’s in my mind right now. So here goes:

Q. Why did you begin painting? I just wanted to. It was back in 1992 – 93 and I was really inspired by corporate logos. (Still am.) I had a couple of ideas in my mind, so painting them out just seemed like the thing to do. My mom was an artist (at one point she designed greeting cards for American Greetings), so I had access to the right materials. (I used to “borrow” her art supplies when she wasn’t around. I just stayed up late painting in the basement. The next morning, I definitely heard about it!)

But I’m a self-taught artist. My technique was really quite poor for a long time. I just kept at it, though. Technically, I’m still not great. I’m more motivated to get ideas out, rather than obsess over surfaces. After all, perfection is just an idea. We never attain it, no matter how hard we try. Creation is a process.

A progression: At left, Scramp King, the first painting I painted, in 1994; at right, my most recent painting.

Q. Why hard edge? My interest in hard-edge painting stems from Jo Baer and Frederick Hammersley. I first came across Baer’s work in the catalog for the SITE Santa Fe Biennial of 2001, curated by Dave Hickey, a critic I really admire. Hammersley was in that show, too, but I didn’t really get the “point” of his work until I saw it in Santa Fe a couple of years ago, at Charlotte Jackson Fine Art. Seeing Hammersley’s work left a lasting impact on me. His work justified, for lack of a better term, my “switch” to painting with a more minimalist style. Plus, he was a pioneer of hard-edge painting, back in 1959. I call my minimal work hard-edge because the edges are clean, but I also believe in carrying on that tradition, even though the term “hard-edge painting” meant something totally different back then.

Mind you, hard edge is one half of my work. The other half is what I call “maximalist.” It’s a descendant of my early “acid pop” work (from 1993 onward). I think it’s really what I’m all about.

I started to explore minimalist painting in 2003, just before I saw that SITE Santa Fe catalogue. I was losing interest in painting in a neo-pop art style, which was my original direction. When the Iraq war started, I started to feel really uncomfortable with irony—spoofing corporate logos. That was a 90’s thing, anyway. I decided I wanted to make something beautiful instead.

So, for about five years, until earlier this year, I couldn’t make up my mind about whether I was to be a minimalist (giving up on my earlier work) or a maximalist (continuing the “acid pop” line of thought). It was a difficult five years. I realized it’s okay to go back and forth between the two styles; they form a complete whole. I thought I had to choose between the two, but that’s not the case.

Q. Who are your major influences? Beyond Baer and Hammersley, I’d say Warhol was my first big influence. He had a Dadaist sensibility, and I was really into Dadaist poetry when I was in school. I loved the way he deflated mass media. For a long time, it was Warhol, Warhol and more Warhol.

Otherwise, artists I really admire include Eduardo Paolozzi (his work is amazing!), Bridget Riley, Julian Stanczak, Stephane Dafflon and early Sarah Morris. And Oliver Hibert, a great artist friend of mine. We’ve been going against the grain, out here in middle-of-nowhere Arizona, for years.

Ultimately, I’m not really inspired by other painters. And I don’t really pay much attention to the “art world,” which seems to be more and more about all of things that art isn’t about. I get more inspiration from semi trucks, vintage wallpaper and fabrics, football (soccer) jerseys, corporate logos and fashion. I just kind of jam all of those influences together in my maximalist work.

How do you make your paintings? I do everything on the computer first. My work isn’t really conducive to improvisation. So I spend a lot of time “versioning things out” on screen first. Sometimes I’ll design something and it will sit there for months, even years, before I go back to it. Also, I mix my colors to printouts. I want to know exactly what I’m going to do before I jump into making a painting.

Wishing you happiness and the causes of happiness,
—Grant Wiggins

Upcoming show: ‘Painting’ at Foundry Art Centre

Monday, September 15th, 2008

Just found out that a couple of my paintings have been selected to show at the Foundry Art Centre in St. Charles, Mo. next month, in a juried exhibition called Painting.

Painting will be on display from Friday, Oct. 10 through Nov. 21. The show is billed as “a juried exhibition celebrating the art of painting,” where “traditional or experimental styles” are welcome. When I saw the word “experimental” in the call for entries, I knew I had to throw something Foundry’s way. Everything I make is an experiment!

The two paintings I’ll be showing are: The Acid Rain Falls Mainly on the Acid Plain (2007, acrylic on canvas, 20 x 16 in.) and Where Is Gibarian? (2008, acrylic on canvas, 21 x 16 in.). Here they are, freshly framed, in my studio this evening.

The Acid Rain Falls Mainly on the Acid Plain and Where Is Gibarian?

Want to know the story behind Where Is Gibarian? As I was painting this piece, I was listening to an audiobook of Stanislaw Lem’s Solaris, a truly mindblowing work of science fiction. (And the Tarkovsky movie is fantastic, too!) When narrator Kris Kelvin enters the space ship Solaris, he’s hoping to meet with a crewmember on board named Gibarian. When Snow, another crewmember, won’t give a straight answer about Gibarian’s whereabouts, Kelvin repeats, “Where’s Gibarian?” Turns out that Gibarian is dead. And the planet they’re orbiting can control the ship’s measurement tools, produce wicked storms and create hallucinated humans. But are they real? You get the idea.

On that note, I wish you happiness and the causes of happiness,

—Grant Wiggins

New maximalist paintings

Sunday, August 31st, 2008

While I haven’t posted much on this blog lately, I’ve been painting practically every day. Here’s a new batch of work.

As you can see, I’ve wholeheartedly returned to my maximalist style. At top is Where Is Gibarian? Below that is Ifx Xypilekk.

Paper art work to show in upcoming Tempe Center for the Arts biennial

Wednesday, July 30th, 2008

I am pleased and proud to announce that my recent paper construction, Ekeliges Zeug! (pronounced ek-el-EE-ges ZOIG), will be among the works of 26 Arizona artists on display in TCA Biennial: Paper this autumn at the Tempe Center for the Arts (TCA).

TCA Biennial: Paper opens Saturday, September 6 in the main gallery of the Tempe Center for the Arts. The show will run through January 10, 2009.

The opening night of TCA Biennial: Paper falls on the one-year anniversary of the opening of the TCA. As a matter of tradition, paper is given as a gift to celebrate first anniversaries. Consequently, the city of Tempe built the show around works on paper, art made of paper, and art inspired by paper.

Eighty-five Arizona artists applied to the show. Judges were impressed by the “high level of craftsmanship and innovativeness” found in works submitted, according to the museum.

TCA Biennial: Paper will be my fourth biennial exhibition in Arizona. Others include the 2003, 2005 and 2007 editions of the Arizona Biennial, held at the Tucson Museum of Art.