Posts Tagged ‘miniature art’

Miniature painting sells; profit is $2.46

Friday, November 6th, 2009

As a friend of mine says, “Anything worth doing is worth not doing for money.” And I completely agree: If love to do something, you don’t care about the stuff that happens after you do it — the happy byproducts, such as sales or awards. The work, itself, is what matters. The work is its own reward.

miniature paintingminiature paintingminiature painting
Three miniature paintings: I have exhibited in Think Small series of miniature art shows in 2005, 2007 and 2009. Above are Tgxgncvkqp 34, Omnicron’s Dilemma, and Telomir 9. Each miniature painting measures 3 inches square.

I was reminded of my friend’s maxim last night, when I was informed I had sold my miniature painting on display at the Think Small 5 miniature art show, called Telomir 9. (The buyer was a friend of a friend … and my friend was in the show, too … and his work sold, as well … but it all still counts, right?)

I decidedly priced this framed miniature painting, which measures 3 inches square, “to sell” — at the low, low, randomly determined price of $47.10. (I used the random.org integer generator; I asked for a number between 4000 and 6000, and out came 4710. Perfect, I thought.)

Sure, selling a work of art is gratifying. And I was naturally pleased by the news of the sale. Yet, somehow that wasn’t enough; I soon found myself puzzling over the financial side of the experience, scribbling a profit and loss calculation on a scrap sheet of paper:

Sale price $47.10
Gallery commission - 23.55
Cost of shipping - 14.70
Cost of frame -   5.39
Cost of materials (estimated) -   1.00
Gross profit $  2.46

The above calculus deliberately excludes the cost of transportation to the shop where I bought the frame, as well as overhead. Were I calculating net profit, there wouldn’t be a profit, I am sure.

I also began to consider how much time was invested into making the work. I actually had to make the painting twice, because I wasn’t happy with the first iteration. All told, I believe I devoted five hours to the process of making, and maybe one hour to fitting the painting into the frame, packing and shipping. That means six hours, or 41 cents per hour.

What does all of this mean? I don’t know, frankly. And I really don’t care, either. If I were to make paintings purely with profitability in mind, perhaps I’d frustrate myself horribly — even though it does sound tantalizing to produce a glossy, Fortune 500-style annual report, detailing all art-related financial activity for my collectors and interested parties!

Contrast this experience to news about the new wave of art auctioned at Christie’s and Sotheby’s this week. The latter auction raked in $181 million on Wednesday; Kees van Dongen’s 1910 Jeune Arabe, alone, was claimed for a record $13.8 million U.S.

All I need to do, now, is sell 15,000 paintings, just like this, every year. Then I’d be in business!

Grant Wiggins

Next show: Miniature art show Think Small 5

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

ThinkSmall5 exhibit runs from November 6, through December 20, 2009 at Artspace Gallery in Richmond, Virginia

miniature art show
Telomir 9: Exhibiting in miniature art show Think Small 5.

For the third time, I will be participating in miniature art show ThinkSmall, held every other year in Richmond. This year will be the fifth ThinkSmall miniature art show; the first was held in 2001.

This time around, I will be exhibiting Telomir 9, which measures 3 inches square, and is acrylic on canvas, mounted on panel. No work of art in the show may exceed 3 inches in any dimension.

See a list of contributing artists at http://www.artspacegallery.org/ts5/. I’m in there somewhere.

For further reading: The painting I exhibited at Think Small 4, in 2007

Grant Wiggins

New piece for upcoming ‘Art in a Box’ show

Wednesday, November 19th, 2008

My newest creation is in a medium that’s entirely new to me: vinyl on plastic. I made it specifically for a show going on next month at art6 Gallery in Richmond, Va., called Art in a Box. The parameters of the show are pretty simple: works “may be wall, pedestal, or shelf pieces, and the theme is open to interpretation,” write the show’s organizers. “Size limit is 12 x 12 x 12 inches.”

I took a fairly literal interpretation of the box theme. Purchased an inexpensive plastic cube, spray painted the interior with white plastic spray paint, then applied vinyl decals (a geometric star pattern I designed a while ago) to the clear front. The name I chose is “Qubiqzirq,” as in cubic zirconia.



Ultimately, this was an experiment … perhaps nothing groundbreaking visually. When I finished, the piece seemed like something Jim Isermann woudl do. Regardless, Qubiqzirq is more like a proof of concept to see how to make something and where I might be able to take it in the future. I’m very interested in making a series of “plastic paintings”—vinyl on fluorescent plexiglass. If anything, just to do something more involved than acrylic on canvas.

That’s it for now. More soon, hopefully.

Wishing you happiness and the causes of happiness,
—Grant Wiggins

Miniature art: Painting small for Think Small 4

Thursday, October 18th, 2007

I just finished a miniature art painting that I’ll be showing for Think Small 4, a miniature art show at art 6 gallery in Richmond, Virginia (November 2 – December 22, 2007). The guiding principle of the show is that no miniature art painting can be larger than 3 inches in any dimension.

This is the second time I’ll be showing in Think Small; I participated in Think Small 3 a couple of years back.

This year I’ve submitted Omnicron’s Dilemma. Acrylic on panel; three inches square.

miniature art paintingminiature art painting
At left is a sketch of the miniature art painting, called Omnicron’s Dilemma, I’ll be showing in Think Small 4. At right is the actual painting, which measures three inches square.

It could be yours, framed, IKEA style, for just $71.10. (I determined the price at random, using the random.org integer generator.)

Ultimately, I think I’m going to paint a larger version of this piece, just to do the design justice.

Omnicron’s Dilemma was an offshoot of the work show below, which just might be the last of my works in a pop art style. It is called An Error Occurred While Processing this Directive:
miniature art painting

There’s lots more I’d like to write about, but I’ve got to cut this short, because I’m catching a plane to Portland tomorrow. Otherwise, I’m very much digging the new album by The Fiery Furnaces, Widow City. I think they’re making some of the most challenging music out today.

Grant Wiggins