Posts Tagged ‘minimalism’

Balancing two very different styles of painting

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009
styles of painting
A simple scatter plot, which graphs independent variables (events that happen independently of each other.)

Creativity is like a scatter plot; it’s not a linear process.

As I look back upon the art I’ve produced over the past six years, I’ve noticed a trend. Actually, it’s a lack of a trend. A trendless trend.

Here’s what I mean: Since 2003, I have been painting and designing according to two very different styles of painting; each has two very different compositional approaches: 1) minimal, reductive paintings and 2) maximalist abstract paintings.

I once thought that I had to choose one of these styles of painting — for once and for all, and for good. I could be only a minimalist or a maximalist. But not both. Not having made up my mind, the way I saw it, was a sign of weakness.

Yet, after much deliberation, I never did make a choice. I just kept on making.

And so I continue: I get really into minimalism. But after a while, I hit a wall, and then get really into maximalist abstract painting, only to get distracted, and re-inspired, by minimalist painting all over again. Hence, my output has leapfrogged from one idea to the next, with seemingly little rhyme or reason, for years.

styles of paintingstyles of painting
Two very different styles of painting: Left: Space Loop I, a minimal painting from 2008. Right: Where Is Gibarian?, a maximalist abstract painting from 2008.

Let your mind bounce from one idea to the next

Good things happen when you follow your creative whims. Surveying my work over recent years, I realize that elements within my compositions are completely modular. For example, a trio of stripes from a minimal painting can easily serve as a focal point in a maximalist abstract painting.

Any color, stripe or shape can be applied to any painting I choose to make, regardless of the associated style.

Therefore, rather than see my creativity as a linear process, I have chosen to see what I make in terms of a scatter plot — a collection of independent variables that reside at different places on a graph — like the one above.

Over time, I have changed my mind frequently, going from one idea to the next, one painting to the next. Each painting is much like an independent variable, even though it is informed by my previous experiences.

Don’t make sense, just make

The creative “jumping around” may not make sense from a near-term perspective. However, I bet you could draw a trend line through a graph of everything I’ve made, delineating the average between all of these points, and everything would interconnect.

It’s easy to say that we should know exactly what we stand for at all times. It’s easy to adopt a singular art style and repeat whatever worked for you in the past. That’s safe. That makes sense.

But when you no longer think about making sense, you free up your mind to focus on making. And making, after all, is what art is all about.

Two new paintings: Civvik and Circuit

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

My objectives for last week have been completed, albeit a couple of days late. With the goal of submitting new pieces to an upcoming juried show, I just completed two “full-scale” renderings of smaller studies.

Today I finished Civvik, and on Friday I put the finishing touches on Circuit. Both are 30 inches square and 4 inches deep. The original studies were 10 inches square and 1.5 inches deep.

The new version of Civvik is actually a reworking of the original. I fixed the curves in the stripes, and the top-most white stripe doesn’t spill over the top edge of the canvas. The white stripes are centered upon the horizontal axis.

Details aside, quite a bit of motoring took place to get these done within 10 days. But now I’m ready to start a series of paintings on paper. I am convinced that this is way to go for the near term. At 60 cents per sheet, I can’t go wrong. Paper is the fastest, easiest way to get ideas out and test them. Assembling stretcher bars and stretching canvas takes too long to get ramped up—something I’m not in the mood for.

So we’ll see how the next few days will shake out. Hopefully I’ll have a lot to upload soon.

Otherwise, I just returned my interlibrary loan copy of Paul Klee’s The Thinking Eye. A compilation of Klee’s notebooks, this brilliant book is one page of sketches after another. Klee explores his philosophy of line and form, and how line becomes form, in an almost mystical way. Definitely a book worth checking out. Amazon has it used for $300. But I think I’ll have to sign it out again instead.

Minimalism meets pop art

Monday, December 8th, 2008

Last week’s production included two paintings (10 x 16 inch, or 25.4 x 40.6 cm) studies inspired by the SEPTA logo.

pop art minimalism

I’ve posted both to flickr. Above is Spectral 2, which seems to me a bit packaging-inspired, even though that’s not the case. Midway into making it, I decided not to flood the perimeter of the canvas with red; instead, the red merely outlines the yellow and white stripes. So perhaps I will begin to pursue a middle-ground between minimal design and graphic design, voyaging back into packaging-inspired works. I feel as if I have been searching for a combination … and I know the floodgates will open when I discover it.

In other news:

• I think I’ve devised the perfect bright red, which has the most intense luminosity of bright red ink. It’s one part naphthol red light, one part fluorescent red. The result is excellent, although it requires six coats. This color lacks the overt fluorescence of fluorescent red, and is more opaque. Completely eye-popping!

• I enjoyed reading this article about Sol LeWitt at Mass MoCA, in yesterday’s New York Times

• I found the Julian Schnabel interview on 60 Minutes compelling last night. Schnabel utterly lost it when Morley Safer breathed mention of critic Robert Hughes. His reaction was visceral. See for yourself here. My take-away was this: If you care that much about what others write and say about your art, you’re probably making art for the wrong reasons. It’s hard to see someone get wound up by a critic. Focus on making the art instead. Make art for yourself. That should be reward in itself. To hell with the rest.

Wishing you happiness and the causes of happiness,
Grant

Images of new paintings now on Flickr

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

Images of a new set of small, “study” paintings I have made over the past two weeks are now online on my flickr page. Here are two examples of what you’ll see there:

flickr paintings
There 1, 2008.
Acrylic on canvas. 10 inches square.

flickr paintings
Angular, 2008.
Acrylic on canvas. 10 inches square.

Best,
Grant Wiggins

In the studio: November 11, 2008

Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

Here’s the latest from the studio: Working on a series of small “study” paintings (10 inches square each), just to test some ideas and see what happens.

As my friend Oliver points out, these small works offer room for an “endless amount of variations.” To be sure, each design has at least two “almost made it” designs behind it, waiting in the wings to be painted.

Testing out new designs as I type this.

Sorry for the poor-quality photo. Hard to portray fluorescent paint, regardless of the quality of lighting.

Thanks for checking this out.
—Grant Wiggins

New minimalist art work, based on ‘long-lost’ minimalist design

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

After going on an early rampage into my new series of paintings inspired by randomness, I hit a creative wall last Friday afternoon. Instead of finishing a maximalist painting (titled Retroactive Psychology)—I was adding a plaid pattern to the top third of it—I felt utterly compelled to paint a minimalist design I conjured up in July 2007, but shelved.

Rather than slog through what I was working on, I abruptly resolved to stop what I was doing and switch things up. So, Saturday morning, I started the painting you see below, which I finished this morning. My thinking was this: If I’m not enjoying making something, it will show.

Above: Cirrex (tentative title), based on a minimalist design I created more than
a year ago, proving how ideas and inspiration can resurface later on.

This new minimalist art work is 30 inches square and acrylic on canvas, as is everything I paint. However, I do not yet know what I am going to call it. Names batted around include Cirrex, Corpex, Xorpec, Xorpekt—but nothing really sticks. Cirrex is the leading candidate, though.

The question from here: What to work on next? I feel more inspired to paint another minimalist design from summer ’07 than I do the random series painting. Does it matter?

I’m already behind in the timetable I outlined for my random series, although I know I’ll come back to it. Also, there’s a lot of work to do in my backyard garden—building raised planting beds, etc. Growing things is becoming more interesting to me. There is no reason to stress about things.

Wishing you happiness and the causes of happiness,

—Grant Wiggins

A self-interview … of sorts

Thursday, September 18th, 2008

A couple of weeks back, I was contacted by year 12 student (equivalent to senior in high school in the U.S.) from Australia named Sarah. For an art class project, she was assigned to “do write-ups on artists,” as she puts it. Surfing around, she found my site, was interested in my hard-edge paintings, and wanted to ask a few questions via email. (Her paintings, by the way, are pretty impressive.)

Since I don’t really have occasion to give interviews, I thought I’d offer my responses here, in case you’re interested. I really like the interview format. It can afford a wonderful way to crystalize ideas and figure out one’s self. In the process, I feel like I learned something, or at least I learned a new way of articulating what’s in my mind right now. So here goes:

Q. Why did you begin painting? I just wanted to. It was back in 1992 – 93 and I was really inspired by corporate logos. (Still am.) I had a couple of ideas in my mind, so painting them out just seemed like the thing to do. My mom was an artist (at one point she designed greeting cards for American Greetings), so I had access to the right materials. (I used to “borrow” her art supplies when she wasn’t around. I just stayed up late painting in the basement. The next morning, I definitely heard about it!)

But I’m a self-taught artist. My technique was really quite poor for a long time. I just kept at it, though. Technically, I’m still not great. I’m more motivated to get ideas out, rather than obsess over surfaces. After all, perfection is just an idea. We never attain it, no matter how hard we try. Creation is a process.


A progression: At left, Scramp King, the first painting I painted, in 1994. At right, my most recent maximalist art work.

Q. Why hard edge? My interest in hard-edge painting stems from Jo Baer and Frederick Hammersley. I first came across Baer’s work in the catalog for the SITE Santa Fe Biennial of 2001, curated by Dave Hickey, a critic I really admire. Hammersley was in that show, too, but I didn’t really get the “point” of his work until I saw it in Santa Fe a couple of years ago, at Charlotte Jackson Fine Art. Seeing Hammersley’s work left a lasting impact on me. His work justified, for lack of a better term, my “switch” to painting with a more minimalist style. Plus, he was a pioneer of hard-edge painting, back in 1959. I call my minimal work hard-edge because the edges are clean, but I also believe in carrying on that tradition, even though the term “hard-edge painting” meant something totally different back then.

Mind you, hard edge is one half of my work. The other half is what I call “maximalist.” It’s a descendant of my early “acid pop” work (from 1993 onward). I think it’s really what I’m all about.

I started to explore minimalist painting in 2003, just before I saw that SITE Santa Fe catalogue. I was losing interest in painting in a neo-pop art style, which was my original direction. When the Iraq war started, I started to feel really uncomfortable with irony—spoofing corporate logos. That was a 90′s thing, anyway. I decided I wanted to make something beautiful instead.

So, for about five years, until earlier this year, I couldn’t make up my mind about whether I was to be a minimalist (giving up on my earlier work) or a maximalist (continuing the “acid pop” line of thought). It was a difficult five years. I realized it’s okay to go back and forth between the two styles; they form a complete whole. I thought I had to choose between the two, but that’s not the case.

Q. Who are your major influences? Beyond Baer and Hammersley, I’d say Warhol was my first big influence. He had a Dadaist sensibility, and I was really into Dadaist poetry when I was in school. I loved the way he deflated mass media. For a long time, it was Warhol, Warhol and more Warhol.

Otherwise, artists I really admire include Eduardo Paolozzi (his work is amazing!), Bridget Riley, Julian Stanczak, Stephane Dafflon and early Sarah Morris. And Oliver Hibert, a great artist friend of mine. We’ve been going against the grain, out here in middle-of-nowhere Arizona, for years.

Ultimately, I’m not really inspired by other painters. And I don’t really pay much attention to the “art world,” which seems to be more and more about all of things that art isn’t about. I get more inspiration from semi trucks, vintage wallpaper and fabrics, football (soccer) jerseys, corporate logos and fashion. I just kind of jam all of those influences together in my maximalist work.

How do you make your paintings? I do everything on the computer first. My work isn’t really conducive to improvisation. So I spend a lot of time “versioning things out” on screen first. Sometimes I’ll design something and it will sit there for months, even years, before I go back to it. Also, I mix my colors to printouts. I want to know exactly what I’m going to do before I jump into making a painting.

Wishing you happiness and the causes of happiness,
—Grant Wiggins

Minimal art: New Süfnex series of paintings

Tuesday, April 29th, 2008

Here for you is some fresh-off-the-griddle goodness, my latest paintings in the Süfnex series. Just put the finishing touches on them, as a matter of fact.

minimal artminimal artminimal art
Left to right: Süfnex Seibu 4, Süfnex Solaris, and Süfnex Seibu 3. I painted them Sunday (Apr 27) through this evening (Apr 29) … in about 54 hours.

Each of these recent explorations of minimal art measures 10 inches square and is acrylic on canvas, as usual.

Keeping the creative energies going, flowing through my speakers over the past couple of days have been these remarkable recordings:

Dandelion Gum by Black Moth Super Rainbow. Utterly phenomenal!

Pop Artificiel by Lassigue Bendthaus … which was brought on by the aforementioned album.

Also, I am reading Minimalism: Origins by Edward Strickland … a very well-written survey of how minimal art, music, etc. came about in the United States in the mid-20th century. I also have my hands on a pile of CSS books, because I’m getting ready to redesign wiggz.com. The functionality will remain the same … just need to start making it look a bit jazzier.

Other from that, things are going well. Can’t wait to cook up more new designs and paintings soon. Until then, I wish you happiness and the causes of happiness.

Grant Wiggins

More Space Loop paintings

Sunday, April 20th, 2008

Here are pics of the latest in the Space Loop series of modern paintings, produced on Thursday, April 10 and Friday, April 11.

Space Loop Paintings
SL0612D30 (30 inches square; acrylic on canvas)

Space Loop Paintings
SL0612CX10 (10 inches square; acrylic on canvas)

The chartreuse piece is an alternate design of the Space Loop series, as noted in my previous post. Felt like I had to paint it anyway, if only as an experiment. It’s now available for sale in the online art store.

Since then, I have been developing a new set of sketches involving a painting I made four years ago, called Süfnex. I look forward to revealing those sketches within the next few days.

I’ve also been brainstorming titles for new work, whether they’re prints, paintings, etc. Some names: Phratophir, Biyuvial, Ostroddol, Etcholxen, Exubeix. There are others, but I will spare you of them! The Basque language is particularly fascinating, and ripe with points of inspiration, as demonstrated by the newspaper Berria.

Otherwise, I have been doing quite a bit of gardening lately, before the Arizona sun increases the degree of difficulty on such activity. Gardening is much like painting, I have found, because it’s very meditative. I started a compost pile in late December, and I look forward to starting a raised garden this summer.

On that note, I wish you happiness and causes of happiness. Thank you for reading.

Grant Wiggins

First Space Loop painting reaches orbit

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

This afternoon, my first Space Loop painting evolved out of concept form, into canvas form:

Space Loop

I am encouraged by this afternoon’s result. I look forward to continuing the series in the near future.

I have to admit that spent a seemingly ridiculous amount of time trying to get the stripes “right” for this series. Hours adjusting the curves, undoing those adjustments, bending the curves some more, comparing them to the original sketch, measuring the distances between stripes, rethinking all of my edits, starting over, etc.

After arriving at two designs, all of the editing came down to one big “hunch,” to borrow a term used by Frederick Hammersley, one of my favorite painters. One composition looked more dynamic. But the other composition looked slightly antisocial, but in a good way. I chose the former.

Can you notice the difference?


What is the difference? Decide for yourself. Left to right are original sketch (December 2006), the more “dynamic” version (from three weeks ago) and a “rethinking” of that version (from last night).

As I was going through this process, I was reminded of the saying “Too much tuning, not enough music.”

I do find myself deliberating, wondering, and doubting my designs perhaps a bit too much. However, I am trying to be more mindful of overthinking my designs. I have to be able to cut off my thought process and say “Time’s up. What’s your decision?” That’s where the hunch comes in.

Anyway, today was a great day. Beautiful weather and good music. Among the many albums on the stereo today were:

Animism by Expo 70 (mind-blowing space/ethereal/droning/classification-defying stuff)

Back from the Futer by Aavikko (brilliant 8-bit Casio tunes from Finland)

Affenstunde by Popol Vuh (a classic from the dawn of the digital era)

I highly recommend any of these albums. On that note, I am heading back to the easel. Thank you for reading.

Grant Wiggins